1. Fetch the signal and its bundle
evidence_summary.gaps — the sources that produced nothing, each with its reason.
2. Read the gaps before the reasoning
3. Check the citations yourself
Every key inevidence_used must exist in the bundle:
MISSING line would mean the model cited something it was not shown. The publication pipeline discards such signals before they reach the feed, so this should always pass — the point is that you can check rather than being told.
4. Recompute the evidence hash
5. Check the anchor honestly
6. Know where verification stops
Proven
The bundle was not edited after hashing. The reasoning cites only what it was shown. Whether an anchor transaction exists.
Not proven
That the evidence was true when collected. Nothing here can establish that a position reading was correct at the moment it was taken.
What a full reproduction looks like
1
Independent hash match
Your recomputation equals the published
evidence_hash.2
Citations resolve
Every
evidence_used key exists in the bundle.3
Gaps accounted for
Every non-
present source has a stated reason, and the verdict is consistent with what remained.4
Anchor status matches reality
anchor_tx is null and anchor_status is queued — consistent with an undeployed contract.Scienter publishes impersonal market signals of general and regular circulation. Nothing here is investment, legal, or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any asset. Scienter is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Trading digital assets can result in the total loss of your funds — see Disclaimers for the full text.